The directors whose films
show a consistency in style and theme are called Auteur. The exclusive
nature of the auteur theory is that directors who write their own films against
those who don’t. It’s the extra measure of control the writer/director exerts
over his idea, and it gives him an edge over other directors in the auteur
debate. The work of the auteur should grow proficiently and mature in
vision with each successive film.
Auteur
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Authorship Theory
Auteur is a way of reading and appraising films through the
imprint of an auteur (author), usually meant to be the director. No matter what
the genre or screenplay, a filmmaker can become a true auteur if they exhibit
the same thematic preoccupations, the same recurring motifs and incidents, and
the same visual style and tempo (Wollen 73).Auteur Theory suggests that the
films will bear their maker’s ‘signature’, which may manifest itself as their
individual personality or perhaps even focus on recurring themes within the
body of work.
According to
Hayward, the origin of “Auteur” or “auteur theory” started in 1913 where
Germany coined up the term author’s film (Autorenfilm). The Autorenfilm is one
of the responses to the French Film d’Art movement, and it is successful in
attracting middle-class audiences to the theatres because of its respectability
as art cinema. The German term of Autorenfilm is associated with polemical
issue regarding questions of authorship. (Hayward, 2013: 27) The German term
Autorenfilm, the films are judged by the work of the author rather than the
person responsible directing it.
Through the
Cashiers discussion on the politique des auteurs, the group developed the
notion of the auteur by binding it closely with the concept of mise-en-scene.
(Hayward, 2013: 28) This shift was due to the avid attention of the Cashiers to
the flood of American movie was once proscribed during the World War 2. They
argued that the auteur status should not be limited as style, also can serve as
a purpose to attain the auteur status. The term of 'Auteur' then could refer
either to a director’s noticeable style through mise-en-sceneor filmmaking
practices, or even the director’s signature was shown in script or scenario on
the film products.
Cashiers group
praised Hollywood filmmakers for working against the studio system, where
mise-en-shot can redeem the lack of control of mise-en-scene. Hence, style and
personalized filmmaking transcend content. The 'politique des auteurs' was a
controversy argument initiated by the Cashiers group to critique the French
cinema on that time that are losing the ability to adapt and also stagnant.
They criticized that the auteurism owes so much on the concepts of camera pen
and mise-en-scene. The proponents of auteurism believed that the director are
the one that responsible on stamping the thematic or narrative and visual
stylistic imprints in this works over a period of time despite the odds imposed
by the studios and the markets.
Andre Bazin, the
film theoretician explained that auteur theory was a way of choosing the
personal factor in artistic creation as a standard of reference, and then
assuming that it continues and even progresses from one film to the next.
According Janet
Staiger, there are seven approaches in authorship which included origin,
personality, sociology of production, signature, reading strategy, site of
discourse and techniques of the self. One of the
approaches, authorship-as-signature strategy could postulate
recurrence of authorship traits only through pieces of artwork. Bordwell
Thompson (2013) also states film styles are distinctive patterns of technique
that we found in a film. The techniques are including mise-en-scene,
cinematography, editing, lighting and sound. And to achieve auteur
title, ones must consecutively shows the same styles across several films.
Everyone has their own habit, this habit that shows consecutively across
several films become his personal style. Through the examination on M. Night
Shyamalan movies, we found that he shows a very good example as an auteur who
reaches his authorship by signature as he shows strong thematic and stylistic
consistent throughout his artwork.
Film Analysis : Themes and Filmmaking Style of M. Night Shyamalan
M. Night Shyamalan
films often feature supernatural and otherworldly phenomena, they generally are
not considered horror movies -- in part because they're relatively
family-friendly affairs, focusing on plot and interpersonal relationships
rather than explicit content. This clean, "classy" style of fright
filmmaking has drawn comparisons to legendary director Alfred Hitchcock -- a
parallel aided by Shyamalan's propensity for twisty storylines and cameo
appearances in his own movies. We’ve cited 3 films directed by M.Night
Shyamalan as movie examples to study authorship theory: Signs
(2002), The Village (2004) and The Happening (2008).
Themes
Family-oriented
In these 3
stories, M. Night Shyamalan portrays the protagonist struggling from the pain
of losing someone that they love and as well as the family protecting each
another, holding each another back. From 4 members of family in Signs (M.
Night Shyamalan, 2002) to the whole citizens that stay in a village of The
Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004) till the huge population in a
city in The Happenings (M. Night Shyamalan, 2008), the amount
of people involved in the 'family' has got more sophisticated.
Family members in Signs. Retrieved from Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002) |
Villagers staying together in The Village. Retrieved from The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004) |
People of the city that involved in the events. Retrieved from The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan, 2008) |
In the movie Signs
(M. Night Shyamalan, 2002), Graham is a father who is still grieving the lost
of his wife was so afraid losing the son in the end. And by working together
with the brother, they manage to kill the alien and save the son. Also, a
similar theme is seen in the movie The Village (M. Night Shyamalan,
2004). The village was started because the chief (father of protagonist)
and the other elders wanted to protect all their love ones from the town as
they all experience loses of love ones in the town. We can see that there is a
more sophisticated handling the theme in The Village (M. Night
Shyamalan, 2004) as the bond of family is no longer one family but a few
families that ended up a village. In The Happening (M. Night
Shyamalan, 2008), the family love and bond continue to expand. In this
film, Alma and Elliot ended up taking care of Jess just like their own kid when
her father dies. M. Night Shyamalan put “family” as the prominent theme in
his films can be seen throughout his film works and it is consecutively more
sophisticated.
Belief and Faith
Belief and Faith
In the movie Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002), Graham is having conflict over the faith and belief towards God. Graham has lost his faith after his wife death but pick up his faith towards God again after saving his son from the remind of his wife's last words - "swing away".
In The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004), the villagers believe the myth that are created by the elders and live protected in the village. They believe that there is really monsters in the woods and "towns" outside the boundary is dangerous without discovering the truth. The monsters, 'Those We Do Not Speak Off' are actually suits that are created by the elders and their posterity were taught not to go into the woods and towns as they might offend the monsters and the world outside the woods are dangerous.
The events happened in The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan, 2008) are believed as an act of nature to kill human beings by some of the people. However, some think that the happening is the government's project. In the film, Elliot explained the act of nature is something that we will never fully understand.
The religious, the myth of 'Those We Do Not Speak Of' and the possibilities of events happened are all created by human. All of the explanations are made and presented by humankind. Though 3 of his movies, Shyamalan successfully lead us to reflect and examine our system of belief in life.
Death as Hope
Death plays a sign of hope, warning and fear sophisticatedly in Shyamalan's film. In Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002), the death of Graham's wife makes him lose hope to believe in God but at the end of the story, he found hope to save Morgan from alien's threaten from the flashback of his dead wife last words. The same idea was used in The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004) when Noah died in the woods wearing the suit of 'Those We Do Not Speak Of'.
Noah died in 'Those We Do Not Speak Of' suit. Retrieved from The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004) |
The elders are
worrying that the lies of the village and creature created will not be a secret
anymore but when the death of Noah unexpectedly gives him another hope to make
the lies even real. The death in the story was used as a sign of warn but a
hope to the people. In The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan,
2008), the significance of death was repeated and matured as a fear
that chase the characters. The death of the inevitable happening have bring the
relationship of Elliot and Alma which going downwards, back together.
Alma has developed being a mother to a child through the happening. Retrieved from The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan, 2008) |
After the happening ends, Alma finally realises that she really does want to be a proper wife to Elliot and a mother to the now-orphaned Jess.
Water as Salvation
Retrieved from Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002) |
Parody
M. Night Shyamalan uses mockery constantly and often
challenges audience’s expectations in his films. One of the example we can find
in Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002) is that instead of the big
space ships and flying spaceships that we often found in any other sci-fi, he
choose using the crop field to creates the presence of the aliens.
In The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan,
2008), instead of the usual supernatural or horror movie that scares that
you could literally see, he tactfully uses a story to allow the audience feels
the creep without seeing any “creatures” or “monster’. What and who causes the
happening? It is just an empty field for audiences to answer or fill with what
terrifies them the most.
Shyamalan shows mockery on audience’s expectations
towards death and killing scene in the movie Signs (M. Night
Shyamalan, 2002), when Graham chopped off the alien fingers, there are no
sign of blood or any other liquid that came off. You might argue that alien
might not bleed, but the same style of treatment was seen in the movie The
Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004). When Noah stabbed Lucius,
there are no blood seen dripping or soaking his shirt, not even when Noah
constantly stab on Lucius. In The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan,
2008), the first scene of people start to killing themselves, there are no
bleeding scene as well. No excessive bloody scene is shown at the
scene when the lawnmower crashing over a victim's body.
The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan, 2008) is a daringly experimental mainstream
thriller films of all time. The tropes of classic disaster movies are used but
inverted in this film. It is a deviance of expectation. The pace of the
disaster thriller film starts of with fraught and slows down after that, but it
becomes almost motionless with fewer words, longer takes, silence and vastness
that you can almost feel it as it reaches the climax. In addition, instead
of reaching the city to find bigger population to survive like usual disasters
films, the characters have to split into smaller and smaller groups to survive.
The event has even then ended suddenly just by showing exact time it ended
when the audiences are expecting to see a plot-twist-happening-end.
Film Style
Cameo
In Signs (M. Night Shyamalan,
2002), he himself stare as the killer of the Graham’s wife, and we could
literally see him from the screen. In The Village (M. Night
Shyamalan, 2004), he plays as the role of the chief officer, whom, only
appeared in a reflection manner. In The Happening (M. Night
Shyamalan, 2008), his style of putting himself in the movie has not
changed, he did participate in the movie, but while audiences were curious
about where is Shyamalan this time round. As what we found from the credits, he
portrayed as Joey, the guy that texted Alma and talked on the phone with her.
He did not show himself like previously, instead, the whole line and his
appearance is only when Alma picked up his call and the voice over of ‘hello’
from the phone.
Reflection
Unlike any other directors, the use of reflection is
believed to be one of the visual style of M. Night Shyamalan especially the
reflection from the item in our daily basis. For instance, in Signs (M.
Night Shyamalan, 2002), Graham uses knife to reflect the alien under the
door of the pantry.
Also, when Graham trying to get Bo the TV, he saw the reflection of the alien on the TV screen.
In the movie The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004), the refrigerator that reflects M. Night Shyamalan's face when the officer trying to get the medicine for Ivy while she is in town.
In the movie The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan, 2008), his style reoccurred. Julian uses the back mirror to check out the back passenger.
Retrieved from Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002) |
Retrieved from Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002) |
Also, when Graham trying to get Bo the TV, he saw the reflection of the alien on the TV screen.
Retrieved from Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002) |
In the movie The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004), the refrigerator that reflects M. Night Shyamalan's face when the officer trying to get the medicine for Ivy while she is in town.
Retrieved from The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004) |
In the movie The Happening (M. Night Shyamalan, 2008), his style reoccurred. Julian uses the back mirror to check out the back passenger.
Controlled Mise-en Shot
One of the very significant M. Night Shyamalan's
style is the controlled mise-en shot. He used 3 main camera techniques in most
of his films. Other than close ups and tracking shots, he also constantly backs
the camera away when something shocking is shown. In Signs (M.
Night Shyamalan, 2002), the lighting and camera frame was controlled by
following the movements of Graham and Merrill in the basement when they were
finding where the air came from. The light and camera frame then stopped
when they realised Morgan were standing right at the wall where the air
entered the basement. The next shocking thing that happened was the
alien's hand grabbing Morgan's neck from the hole where the air entered. In The
Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004), controlled miss-en-shot
was again, used on the scene when Ivy was crossing the woods alone to get
to the town to get the medicine to save Lucius. When the creature appears
behind Ivy, the camera frame followed her head movements, turning to face
the creature who were actually Noah wearing the suits. The camera moves as if
it is the Ivy's head.
Twisted Plot with Editing
One of Shyamalan's style is to review the twist at the end of the story. In Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002), the plot was twisted by the flashback cuts in Graham's dream of her wife's death. The flashback reviewed is character-motivated. The similar style was used in The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004), however it works none like montage sequences. The flashback of the characters was taken out from diegesis. When Edward open the black box with the pictures of the elders and their family, none of the characters are thinking about the flashback. The reason of why the village was started is reviewed at the end of the story.
Twisted Plot with Editing
One of Shyamalan's style is to review the twist at the end of the story. In Signs (M. Night Shyamalan, 2002), the plot was twisted by the flashback cuts in Graham's dream of her wife's death. The flashback reviewed is character-motivated. The similar style was used in The Village (M. Night Shyamalan, 2004), however it works none like montage sequences. The flashback of the characters was taken out from diegesis. When Edward open the black box with the pictures of the elders and their family, none of the characters are thinking about the flashback. The reason of why the village was started is reviewed at the end of the story.
Conclusion
M. Night Shyamalan
is not only the director but also the producer and as well as screenplay writer
in these 3 films that we cited. The many themes in his movies that projected real
life make a good platform for us to ponder about. M. Night Shyamalan
totally deserve the auteur title as auterism stresses on its qualities in terms
of the values of repetition of motive or imageries and the consistency of style
and he successfully nailed it.
Reference
Bordwell, D. and Thompson, K. (1997). Film
art. 10th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, p.308.
Caseylamarca.com, (2015). The Happening.
[online] Available at: http://caseylamarca.com/the_happening_10.html [Accessed
26 Feb. 2015].
Dlibrary.acu.edu.au, (2015). Auteur Theory.
[online] Available at:
http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/staffhome/siryan/screen/auteur%20theory.htm
[Accessed 26 Feb. 2015].
Gerstner, D. and Staiger, J. (2003). Authorship
and film. New York: Routledge.
Harris, M. (2015). M. Night Shyamalan.
[online] About.com Entertainment. Available at:
http://horror.about.com/od/filmmakerbiographies/p/mnightshyamalan.htm [Accessed
26 Feb. 2015].
Hayward, S. (2013). Cinema studies. 4th
ed. London: Routledge, pp.27-33.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)